ComplianceIQ extracts what you must address. PastPerfIQ finds your best evidence. ProposalIQ shows how evaluators score what you wrote.
The critical intelligence layer between receipt of solicitation and submission — the phase where proposals are won or lost before the government ever reads them.
ComplianceIQ, ProposalIQ, and PastPerfIQ are independently deployable systems — each producing professional interactive deliverables the client owns permanently, with no server dependency, no subscription lock-in, and no persistent data between runs.
Extracts the binding obligations it detects across a federal solicitation, and flags suspected omissions for review. Excel matrix + live interactive HTML dashboard that updates as your team works.
Simulates government source-selection evaluation with an adaptive checklist that adjusts to the solicitation type — grading the proposal against what the RFP actually requires. Executive dashboard plus 11 interactive sections with a submission-readiness verdict.
Scores your federal contract history against the current solicitation. Ready-to-submit Word volume + interactive Excel tracker + HTML dashboard.
Interested in licensing or acquiring the IQ Suite for your platform or organization?
Contact us for partnership and licensing inquiries →We are exploring strategic partnerships, licensing arrangements, and acquisition discussions with GovCon software platforms and government technology firms. The IQ Suite is independently deployable and available for integration into existing platforms. If you are building in this space and see a fit, we would like to hear from you.
Start the Conversation →A panel of five simulated evaluators independently scores your proposal against what the RFP actually requires, with an adaptive checklist that adjusts to the solicitation type. They reach consensus and deliver an executive dashboard plus 11 interactive sections — with a submission-readiness verdict and a prioritized fix-it punch list, while you still have time to act.
Want to see it on your own RFP? → Request a Live DemoCapture managers, proposal managers, and BD directors at small-to-mid government contractors who compete seriously — but don't have a dedicated red team on staff. If you're pursuing federal or DoD contracts and need an expert adversarial review before you hit submit, this was built for you.
We understand the sensitivity of proposal documents. Our infrastructure is built around it.
Pipeline architected for GovCloud deployment. Designed for FedRAMP and DoD IL environments.
Our infrastructure provider does not use inputs or outputs to train its models — by default or otherwise.
Each pipeline run is isolated per client. No data from one engagement is accessible to another — by architecture, not just policy.
The pipeline holds no state between runs. Each run is isolated — no data from one client's engagement is ever accessible to another.
We can execute a mutual NDA prior to any document submission.
Stateless per-run pipeline designed for integration into existing enterprise infrastructure.
Most losses happen before submission. The flaws were there — nobody caught them in time.
A single missed requirement — page count, certification, unanswered factor — can get your proposal declared non-compliant and eliminated before a single evaluator reads a word.
Generic capability statements don't win contracts. Evaluators reward proposals that speak to the agency's priorities with evidence-backed discriminators. Most don't make that connection.
Large primes have dedicated red teams. Smaller contractors don't. Reviewing your own proposal means the same blind spots that created the problems are looking for them.
Agencies are deploying AI to machine-read proposals before humans see them — one compliance gap flagged by AI can sink you without a full read.
GSA, DoD, VA, DHS, Army — agencies across federal procurement are actively deploying AI to screen proposals, flag compliance deficiencies, and surface disqualification risks. A proposal that would have reached an evaluator's desk three years ago may never get there today.
Federal agencies are actively deploying AI to screen, score, and evaluate proposals — before a human reviewer reads a single word. If you're not preparing your proposal to survive AI screening, you're not preparing it to win.
Enforces document limits and auto-calculates scores for large IDIQ vehicles including OASIS+, Polaris, and Alliant 3 — self-scoring submissions evaluated against predefined criteria without initial human review.
Actively funding AI tools to assist proposal evaluation. PEO Enterprise awarded three AI-system contracts in September 2024 to support real-life acquisition requirements packages.
The Air Force PEO for Cyber and Networks ($21B portfolio) is deploying AI to process proposals, RFPs, and market research — slashing the acquisition cycle from 14 months toward 14 days.
Pioneered the use of AI to rapidly surface relevant CPARS performance records during source selection — enabling contracting officers to spot risks before a source selection board.
The April 2025 OMB memoranda direct every federal agency to accelerate AI adoption across procurement — including proposal intake, evaluation support, and compliance scoring.
Sources: GSA OASIS+ · Army PEO Enterprise · AF PEO Cyber & Networks · DHS CPARS AI · OMB M-25-21/22 (Apr 2025)
The ProposalIQ evaluation engine mirrors the actual government review process — cross-referencing your proposal against the RFP and competitive landscape at every stage. Think of it as an automated Red Team and color team review (Pink, Red, and Gold) compressed into a single pass, run before your proposal ever reaches the government.
Upload your RFP, proposal draft, compliance matrix, pricing and cost volumes, basis of estimate, and competitor intelligence.
Your proposal is evaluated across five independent evaluator domains — each assessed across compliance, technical merit, win themes, price, past performance, clarity, evidence quality, and competitive positioning.
Five independent evaluator perspectives — each with domain-specific checklists and a distinct scoring lens — review your proposal and produce individual assessments. A consensus summary reconciles their findings into prioritized recommendations, followed by a simulated panel debrief.
Your full Red Team Report is generated as a self-contained interactive HTML file. Eleven sections organized into two reading paths — a Primary Path for executive decision-makers and a Reference Layer for your writing team.
One comprehensive report. Every analysis section your proposal needs before submission.
One-page visual command center — submission verdict, overall rating, factor ratings by evaluation criterion, P-Win score, compliance status, and deficiency counts. All tiles are interactive and clickable. The first thing your team sees.
Overall rating, pass/fail compliance status, open issues count, top 3 strengths, and top 3 critical risks.
Line-by-line RFP requirement mapping with gap status.
Five independent evaluator perspectives on evaluation factors.
Cross-evaluator consensus showing evaluators' rating and reconciled finding.
Writing quality and evidence assessment, customer focus score, claim proof density rating, ghost theme analysis, and discriminator evaluation.
Proposed price vs. contract ceiling, price-to-ceiling ratio, competitive pricing analysis, realism flags, and risk assessment.
References submitted, relevance scoring, CPARS availability, and recency rating — evaluated against the solicitation's past performance criteria.
Must Fix and High Priority action items ranked by urgency — each tied to a specific RFP requirement, with page-level remediation guidance for your writing team.
Competitive field analysis — how your top competitors will exploit your proposal's current gaps, where the incumbent holds structural advantages, and how to close the distance.
Your proposal assessed by a five-member simulated evaluation panel — each evaluator provides a role-specific critique with panel alignment summary.
Final P-Win assessment, competitive landscape, and Advisory consensus closing recommendation.
ProposalIQ is one of three independently deployable systems in the IQ Suite. Explore ComplianceIQ and PastPerfIQ — or request a live demo on your own solicitation.
ComplianceIQ reads any federal solicitation — structured or unstructured — and extracts contractor obligations from across the full solicitation into an auditable compliance matrix. Delivered as an interactive Excel matrix and a live HTML dashboard that updates as your team works. Deterministic validation gates enforce structural integrity, and a reconciliation scan flags suspected omissions before delivery.
Want to see it on your own solicitation? → Request a Live Demo| Req ID | Obl | Type | Ref | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REQ-001 | SHALL | TECH | C.1.1 | Issue ROD IAW CDRL A009 upon GFM discrepancy |
| REQ-003 | WILL | MGMT | C.1.1 | Overall demil responsibility extends to subs |
| REQ-004 | WILL | TECH | C.1.1 | OB/OD not permitted — DQ trigger |
| REQ-006 | SHALL | TECH | C.3.1 | Submit Safety Site Plan per para 5.3 |
| REQ-009 | MUST | SUB | L.2.1 | Page count not to exceed 40 pages |
Built for capture managers making bid/no-bid decisions and proposal managers before they start writing. If you're tired of spending days manually shredding RFPs — or worrying about what you missed — this was built for you.
Most proposals miss requirements not because the writers were careless — but because manual extraction is error-prone, slow, and impossible to verify completely.
Copying SHALL/MUST/WILL into a spreadsheet takes 3–5 hours. A matrix with cross-section synthesis, citations, section mapping, and risk flags takes 45–60 hours. ComplianceIQ delivers it in typically under 15 minutes (≈14 min on a 350-page solicitation).
A single missed SHALL can get your proposal thrown out before a human evaluator reads a word.
A compliance matrix built by copying requirements into a spreadsheet has no audit trail, no structural validation, and no way to surface what was missed. ComplianceIQ enforces 36 structural invariants on every run and reconciles every extracted obligation against a deterministic scan of the source documents — so suspected omissions are flagged, not silent.
Agencies are deploying AI to machine-read proposals for compliance before an evaluator sees a single page — one compliance gap flagged by AI can sink you.
Purpose-built extraction that finds SHALL, MUST, and WILL obligations across the solicitation, reconciles them against a deterministic source scan to flag suspected omissions instead of failing silently, and maps them to your proposal structure.
Upload your RFP, SOW, Amendments, Q&A, and Sections L and M are all captured — no document size limit.
SHALL, MUST, and WILL obligations are extracted from every document, assigned a unique Req ID, classified by type (Technical, Cost, Security, Management, etc.), and cross-referenced against the solicitation's instructions and evaluation criteria (Section L and Section M where present).
Your compliance matrix is delivered as an editable XLSX and an interactive HTML dashboard — complete with summary statistics, disqualification-risk flags, advisory notes per requirement, and ownership-assignment columns ready for your writing team.
SHALL/MUST/WILL obligations extracted from every document — with Req ID, obligation, type, section reference, and verbatim quote.
Per-requirement guidance written for each obligation — what the evaluator is looking for and the common mistakes that lose points. The scorer's-seat read, not just the requirement text.
Mapping from submission instructions to evaluation criteria (Section L ↔ Section M where present) — so gaps between what you submit and how you're scored are surfaced.
Each requirement flagged with a severity level, HIGH-risk obligations surfaced first — so your team works the most critical items early.
Counts by requirement type, obligation, and section — for your bid/no-bid decision.
Columns pre-built for owner, status, page reference, and sign-off.
Live management dashboard that reloads from the Excel matrix as your team updates it. Critical flags auto-surfaced. Due dates tracked with color-coded urgency. Crosswalk filterable by gap status. Works offline in any browser — no server required.
Contract Data Requirements List items and deliverable data items tracked in their own tab — so submission obligations are managed alongside the requirement matrix.
ComplianceIQ is one of three independently deployable systems in the IQ Suite. Explore ProposalIQ and PastPerfIQ — or request a live demo on your own solicitation.
PastPerfIQ scores your entire federal contract history against the current solicitation across seven weighted dimensions — scope similarity, dollar value, recency, NAICS match, agency match, contract type, and CPARS performance ratings (where available). Every contract ranked. Every reference tiered: Recommended, Conditional, Avoid, or Exclude. And for each run — a built-in advisory telling you exactly which reference to lead with, how to close any gaps, and what to do before you submit.
| Contract | Tier | Scope | Value | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W519TC-21-C-0042 | REC | TECH | $18M | 87/100 |
| HQ0034-22-D-0018 | REC | MGMT | $12M | 81/100 |
| W52H09-20-C-0011 | COND | TECH | $6M | 64/100 |
| N00024-19-C-6247 | AVOID | ADMIN | $2M | 31/100 |
| FA8726-18-C-0042 | EXCL | TECH | $0.8M | 8/100 |
PastPerfIQ pulls your entire federal contract history, scores each contract against the current solicitation, and delivers a tiered reference list ready for your proposal team.
Upload your current solicitation and your entity information. PastPerfIQ pulls your complete federal contract history from USASpending.gov — no manual data entry required.
Every contract in your history is scored across seven weighted dimensions: scope similarity, dollar value, recency, NAICS match, agency match, contract type, and CPARS performance ratings (where available). Each dimension is weighted against the solicitation's evaluation criteria.
Every contract tiered as Recommended, Conditional, Avoid, or Exclude. Delivered as a ready-to-edit Word volume, an Excel tracker, and an interactive HTML dashboard — all in 3–15 minutes.
Every contract scored and tiered: Recommended, Conditional, Avoid, or Exclude — with composite score, relevancy rating, performance confidence, and risk flags for each.
Pre-populated past performance volume for your top Recommended contracts — Relevance Statement, Capability Demonstration, and Performance Quality sections written per reference, with placeholders for POC details ready to complete.
Full dimension-by-dimension breakdown for every contract — showing exactly why each contract scored as it did across all seven dimensions.
Live dashboard showing contract rankings, score breakdowns, and tier distribution — shareable with your proposal team.
Seven actionable advisories — which reference to lead with, how to close coverage gaps, which performance dimensions to address in your PPQ narratives, and where to submit. Sourced directly from the government's own evaluation criteria and PPI form.
Every PastPerfIQ run includes Advisory Notes — a built-in consultant's view of your results. Your strongest reference, named. Your reference shortfall, with two concrete options to close it. Your NAICS gap, explained. Your PPQ obligations, with the specific FAR citation. No orange warnings. No alarm. Just clear guidance from someone who's sat in the evaluator's seat.
PastPerfIQ is one of three independently deployable systems in the IQ Suite. Explore ComplianceIQ and ProposalIQ — or request a live demo on your own solicitation.
The IQ Suite was built by two former DoD professionals with 50+ combined years of acquisition, process engineering, and proposal evaluation experience. The evaluation methodology in ProposalIQ, the obligation classification rules in ComplianceIQ, and the scoring dimensions in PastPerfIQ are not approximations — they are the actual frameworks used by government source selection boards, encoded into deterministic rules engines.
25+ years of DoD acquisition and program management experience across both government service and private industry. Designed and built the proprietary evaluation engine — calibrated from the inside out by someone who has personally sat on source selection evaluation panels and conducted Red Team reviews in the defense industry.
25+ years of DoD quality and systems engineering experience. Brings the structured analytical discipline behind our deterministic risk assessment methodology — rooted in the same frameworks used across DoD acquisition programs at the highest levels.
We are exploring strategic partnerships, licensing arrangements, and acquisition discussions with GovCon software platforms and government technology firms. The IQ Suite is independently deployable and available for integration into existing platforms. If you are building in this space and see a fit, we would like to hear from you.
Start the Conversation →Submit any public federal solicitation. We run it through the system live — ComplianceIQ extracts detected obligations in typically under 15 minutes, PastPerfIQ scores your contract history, ProposalIQ evaluates your draft proposal. You see exactly what the system produces on your own document before any decision is made.
Or reach us directly: sales@proposalredteam.com
The IQ Suite — The IQ Suite — Pre-Submission Proposal Intelligence.